The stunning revelation in Durham hearing should chill us to the core

The Durham hearing, which has been a long-awaited event for anyone interested in the origins of the Russia investigation, has recently produced some truly stunning revelations. These developments should leave all of us feeling deeply disquieted.

The first major revelation was that the FBI gave Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer, a significant amount of money to investigate Trump and his associates in 2016. This revelation bodes poorly for the reputation of the FBI, which has been under intense scrutiny in recent years.

The second, and perhaps more consequential, revelation was that the FBI had reason to suspect that Steele’s dossier contained disinformation from Russian intelligence operatives. Even though the FBI was aware of this, they still continued to rely on Steele’s reporting for their investigation. In other words, the FBI may have unwittingly been doing Russia’s bidding by relying on Steele’s unverified and potentially false information.

The implications of these revelations are far-reaching. For one, it raises serious questions about the FBI’s competence and integrity. It also suggests that the Russia investigation was based on thin and potentially misleading evidence, which raises questions about the legitimacy of the entire investigation.

As a writer who has followed these developments closely, I can tell you that this is a watershed moment in the ongoing Russia saga. It is now clearer than ever that there are serious problems with the way our law enforcement agencies investigate political campaigns. The public deserves better than this, and it is imperative that we demand more transparency and accountability from those in power.

In conclusion, the Durham hearing has produced some troubling revelations about the origins of the Russia investigation. We must not turn a blind eye to these developments, but instead must demand better from those in power. The future of our democracy may depend on it.